So here is the strategy: we will be working on 2 amendments to the constitution, one narrowly constructed to address overturning the recent Supreme court decision and the other a broader amendment that is aimed at educating the public about the need for corporate Environmental and Social Responsibility (hence the ESRA) and this second one will not pass but will be a way of articulating some parts of our vision for a society that could actually survive the 21st century. The 4 under consideration below are not final versions--that will happen after we get your feedback at our June conference. Meanwhile, you are invited to add your own specific language and versions of either the narrow or broad amendment, which we will happily consider.

Responding to the Supreme Court's "Citizens United" decision

It was generally agreed at the Feb. Tikkun/Network of Spiritual Progressives’  conference in San Francisco that NSP should endorse any legislative approaches that could be taken to offset the destructive impact of the Supreme Court's decision to consider corporations to be "persons" and hence protected by the 14th Amendment, and to consider spending of money in elections to be "speech" that would then be protected under the First Amendment. Reversing this decision is a high priority for all who wish to build a society based on spiritual principles of caring and generosity, since corporations necessarily have a different “bottom line” requiring them to maximize financial returns for their investors.  It was also understood that any legislation passed by Congress would likely have only short-term advantages,  because the Supreme Court might well block any such legislation as unconstitutional for the same reason that it has now struck down other attempts to restrain corporate power in the electoral arena provided by the McCain-Feingold legislation. 

There was considerable sentiment at the SF conference that a short and narrowly constructed amendment to the Constitution might have more chance of passage, and hence that the NSP should join with other national organizations in the effort to get such an amendment passed.

There was also widespread excitement about the idea of using this historical moment to bring into national discourse the notion that democracy-loving Americans need more severe constraints on corporate power which had reached toxic levels even before the Supreme Court’s unfortunate “Citizen’s United” decision. S  we have concluded that we need a three part strategy: a. endorse legislation to overturn Citizen’s United decision of the Supreme Court  b. support whatever campaign develops for a short and narrowly constructed Amendment to the Constitution that would permanently overturn the notion that corporations should have the same rights in the electoral arena that American citizens have; and c. construct and launch a public education campaign for a much broader Amendment which would include b. but would also specify and require other elements of corporate ethical and environmental social responsibility.

The versions below are meant to be suggestive of different levels of inclusiveness, not final formulations which will be drafted by constitutional lawyers. But we want to get your feedback on the ideas of how much we should cover in this second broader Amendment, remembering that we will ALSO support a narrower and more likely to be accepted version. The point of the broader version is to bring a conception of corporate social responsibility into the public discourse—the goal is to change people’s conceptions of what politics could be addressing and to encourage a conception of environmental and ethical responsibility and democratic control of the economy that at this moment is far beyond what is accepted in public discourse as “realistic.” Just as the ERA never passed, but had a huge impact in changing people’s understanding of the need for equality for women, so the ESRA could have that same impact. So while we want your suggestions about how to refine one or more of these proposed versions, we do not need to be told that they are “unrealistic,” because precisely the point of this second versions of an  Amendment in our 2 part strategy is to transform the consciousness of what is or is not realistic.

We will publish your ideas on the web and at lest some fo the alternative versions we are receiving, and continue this discussion at the June 11-14 conference in D.C., and then will try to combine the responses from both the Feb. and June conference, and  come up with a strategy that is informed by your feedback.

The following two amendments are examples of the “short” version that will also be endorsed by Tikkun/NSP as the more “realistic” version to accompany the Environmental and Social Responsibility Åmendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Congressperson Edwards and Conyers Amendment 

`Section 1. The sovereign right of the people to govern being essential to a free democracy, Congress and the States may regulate the expenditure of funds for political speech by any corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity.

`Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.'.

 ***********************************************

The Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment to the U.S. Constitution  (Version one)

  

 (ESRA): The Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

         (as proposed by Rabbi Michael Lerner and Peter Gabel and advanced through the work of The Network of Spiritual Progressives)

 The intent of the framers of this Amendment is to:
a. Protect the planet and its inhabitants from environmentally destructive behavior and economic arrangements, and to increase environmental responsibility on the part of all corporations and government bodies.
b. Increase U.S. citizens’ democratic control over American economic and political institutions and ensure that all people, regardless of income, have the same electoral clout and power to shape policies and programs.
c. Promote the well-being of citizens of the United States by recognizing that our well-being depends on the well-being of the planet and all its inhabitants, which in turn requires an end to poverty, wars, and violence, and the rise of a new
global ethic of genuine caring and interdependence.

Article One: The Pro-Democracy Clause

A. The First & Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution shall apply only to human beings, and not corporations, limited liability associations, and other artificial entities created by the laws of the United States.
B. Money or other currency shall not be considered a form of speech within the meaning of the First Amendment to the Constitution, and its expenditure is subject to egulation by the Congress and by the legislatures of the several States.
C. Congress shall regulate the amount of money used to disseminate ideas or shape public opinion in any federal election in order to assure that all major points of view
regarding issues and candidates receive equal exposure to the greatest extent possible. Congress shall fund all major candidates for the House, Senate and Presidency in all major elections.
D. In the three months prior to any election for a federal position, all media or any other means of mass communication reaching more than 300,000 people shall provide equal time to all major presidential candidates to present their views for at least an hour at least once a week, and equal time once every two weeks for congressional
candidates during that media agency’s prime time. The candidates shall determine the form and content of that communication. During the three months prior to an
election, no candidate, no political party, and no organization seeking to influence public policy may buy time in any media or form of mass communication or any other form of mass advertising including on the Internet. Major candidates shall be defined as:
a. those who have at least 5% of support as judged by the average of at least ten independent polling firms, at least two of which are selected by the candidates deemed "not major,"
3 months before any given election,
b. or any candidate who can collect the signatures of 5% of the number of people who voted in the election for that office the last time that office was contestedin an election. These petitions can only be signed by people eligible to vote in
the relevant electoral districts. Every state shall be instructed to develop similar provisions aimed at allowing candidates for the governor and state legislatures to be freed from their dependence on wealthy donors.

Article Two: Corporate Environmental and Social Responsibility

A. Every citizen of the United States and every organization chartered by the U.S. or any of its several states  shall have a responsibility to promote the ethical, environmen-
tal, and social well-being of all life on the planet Earth. This being so, corporations chartered by the Congress and by the several States shall demonstrate the ethical, environmental, and social impact of their proposed activities at the time they seek permission to operate. In addition, any corporation with gross receipts in excess of $100 million shall obtain a new corporate charter every five years, and this charter
shall be granted only if the corporation can prove a satisfactory history of environmental, social, and ethical responsibility to a grand jury of ordinary citizens.

Factors to be considered by the grand jury in determining whether a corporation will be granted a charter shall include but not be limited to:

1. The degree to which the products produced or services provided are beneficial rather than destructive to the planet and its oceans, forests, water supplies, land, and air, and the
degree to which its decisions help ensure that the resources of the earth are available to future generations.
2. The degree to which it pays a living wage to all and arranges its pay scale such that none of its employees or contractors earn more than ten times the wages of its
lowest full-time wage earners; the degree to which it provides equal benefits including health care, child care, retirement pensions, sick pay, and vacation time to all
employees; and the degree to which its employees enjoy satisfactory safety and health conditions.
3. The degree to which it supports the needs of the communities in which it operates and in which its employees live, including the degree to which it resists the temptation to move assets or jobs to other locations where it can pay workers less or provide weaker environmental and worker protections.
4. The degree to which it encourages significant democratic participation by all its employees in corporate decision making; the degree to which it discloses to its employees and investors and the public its economic situation, the factors shaping its past decisions, and its attempts to influence public discourse,  and the degree to which it follows democratic
procedures internally

5. The degree to which it treats its employees, its customers, and the people and communities in which it operates with adequate respect and genuine caring for their well-being, and rewards its employees to the extent that they engage in behaviors that manifest genuine caring, respect, kindness, generosity, and ethical and environ-
mentally sensitive practices.

6. The degree to which its investment decisions enhance and promote the economic, social, and ethical welfare of the communities in which its products may be produced, sold, or advertised and/or the communities from which it draws raw materials.
 

If the grand jury is not satisfied with the level of environmental, social, and ethical responsibility, it may put the corporation on probation and prescribe specific changes
needed. If after three more years the jury is not satisfied that those changes have been adequately implemented, the jury may assign control of the board and officers of the corporation to non-management employees of the corporation and/or to its public stakeholders and/or to another group of corporate directors and managers who seem most likely to successfully implement the changes required by the jury, but with the condition that this new board must immediately implement the changes called for by the jury within two years time.

B Any government office or project receiving government funds that seeks to engage ln a contract (with any other corporation or limited liability entity) involving the expenditure of over $100,000 (adjusted annually for inflation) shall require that those who apply to fulfill that contract submit an Environmental and Social Responsibility
Impact Report to assess the applicant’s corporate behavior in regard to the factors listed above in point A of Article II. Community stakeholders and non-supervisory employees may also submit their own assessment by filling out the Environment and Social Responsibility Impact Report. Contracts shall be rewarded to the applicant with the best record of environmental and social responsibility that can also satisfactorily fulfill the other terms of the contract.

Article Three: The Positive Requirement to Enhance Human Community and Environmental Sustainability

A. Earth being the natural and sacred home of all its peoples, Congress shall develop legislation to enhance the environmental sustainability of human communities and
the planet Earth, and shall present a report annually to the American people on progress made during the previous year in ameliorating any conditions deemed by an independent group of scientists to be adverse to the planet’s long-term environmental welfare. The objectives of such legislation shall include but not be limited to alleviating global warming, reducing all forms of pollution, restoring the ecological
balance of the oceans, and assuring the well-being of all forests and animal life. The President of the United States shall have the obligation to enforce such legislation
and to develop executive policies to assure the carrying out of its objectives.

B. In order to prepare the people of the United States to live as environmentally and socially responsible citizens of the world, and to recognize that our own well being as
citizens of the United States depends upon the well being of everyone else on Earth and the well being of this planet itself, every educational institution receiving federal funds whether directly or through the several states, shall provide education in reading, writing and basic arithmetic, and appropriate instruction including at least one required course per year per grade level from kindergarten through 12th grade, to all
of its students in:
1. the skills and capacities necessary to develop a caring society manifesting love, generosity, kindness, joy, rational and scientific thinking, non-violence, celebration, thanksgiving, forgiveness, humility, ethical and ecological sensivity, appreciation of humanity’s rich multicultural heritage as expressed in literature, art, music, religion,  and philosophy

2. the appropriate scientific, ethical, and behavioral knowledge and skills required to assure the long term environmental sustainability of the planet Earth, and to do so in ways that enhance the well being of everyone on the planet, and
3. The measurement of student progress in the areas covered by sections 1 and 2 being, like artistic and musical skills, difficult or impossible to measure by quantitative criteria, educational institutions supported directly or indirectly by public funds shall develop subtle and appropriate qualitative ways of evaluating adequate progress on the part of students
in the areas specified, ways that contribute to and not detract from  students’ ability to love learning and to enhance their capacities to cooperate rather than compete ith their fellow students in the process of intellectual and emotional growth. Teachers shall be funded to learn the skills described in points A and B and the methods of evaluation appropriate to this kind of values-oriented subject matter. 

[ ] Yes! I’ll support the Campaign for the ESRA by:  a. donating money   [ ] seeking endorsements from elected officials, city councils, state legislatures, unions, professional or civic organizations, religious communities, and people in my neighborhhod   [ ] writing articles   [ ] seeking financial support from foundations, corporationsor wealthy people whom I know